"ON THIS DAY, G-D WILL FORGIVE"
(Courtesy: Rabbi Dr. Shlomo Riskin)
Rejoicing on Yom Kippur over G-d's grace.
A major aspect of the Yom Kippur liturgy is the service of the High Priest on this sacred Day of Forgiveness. The detailed description of the highly dramatic service can only be understood within the context of the Biblical promise, "For on this day G-d will forgive you for all of your sins to purify you...." Indeed, the High Priest assumes the role of the historic Community of Israel, and it is to a great extent the result of his proper execution of the service of the day which brings about the atonement of a nation.
Furthermore, the High Priest enters this holiest of places not only once with the incense; he is enjoined to enter the Holy of Holies again, much later in the afternoon, when he must remove his golden garments, bathe for a fourth time that day of days, put on his white linen garments, and then enter the Holy of Holies once again. But on this second occasion there is no specific offering that the High Priest brings, certainly no offering mentioned within the Bible or the Talmud. So why does the High Priest enter again? After all, one dare not take the Holy of Holies lightly; we would expect to find some offering or sacred service as a necessary justification for changing garb, ritually immersing (bathing) and entering the most sacred and protected place in the world.
There are those who suggest that the High Priest changes clothes this fourth time to enter the Holy of Holies again in order to remove the vessels he had brought in with him on his previous visit. Many of the commentaries suggest that this teaches a critical lesson in human conduct: one must always clean after oneself, even if one happens to be a High Priest. However, why wasn't he instructed to remove the vessels when he was emerging from the Holy of Holies after his first visit? Removing the vessels does not seem to justify an additional entrance into the Sanctum Sanctorum.
I would like to explain this second visit of the High Priest based upon a fascinating instruction found in many High Holy Day prayer books (Machzorim) from two centuries back. I am referring to the most popular Avinu Malkenu ("Our Father, Our King") prayer, which concludes: "Avinu Malkenu, please be gracious to us for no reason and answer us; we do not have meritorious good deeds; act in compassionate righteousness and loving kindness towards us and save us." In most early versions of the Mahzor prayer books, the following instruction is inserted - in small print - before this last Avinu Malkenu request: "The Holy Ark is to be closed before reciting this petition and it is to be uttered in a whisper."
The usual interpretation given for this instruction is built around the following analogy: Imagine that you owe a person $1,000 and now seek a loan of another $1,000. The last thing one would expect the borrower to do is make the request of the loan by shouting from the rooftops, and then shamelessly adding that he doesn't have the means with which to pay the lender his earlier obligation. At best, the divulging of one's monetary position and a frank assessment as to a possible repayment plan would be done in a low voice, an embarrassed whisper. Thus, the analogy suggests that by closing the Holy Ark at this point, the petitioner remains modest in his request and at least divulges his 'lack of funds' quietly.
Despite the logic of what has been written, the great Hassidic sage Rabbi Levi Yitzhak of Berditchev would nevertheless insist upon keeping the Holy Ark open for this last request and would sing the words out loud in unison with the congregation. He explained his departure from the earlier custom by relying on what he believed was the central teaching regarding Yom Kippur: our G-d is a G-d of unconditional and freely given love, who guarantees our forgiveness despite our lack of worthiness and our dearth of good deeds. This is the Biblical
Rabbi Levi Yitzhak's interpretation is completely borne out by the magnificent book of Jonah, which we read towards the conclusion of Yom Kippur. Jonah attempted to escape from G-d's presence because his sense of truth and justice could not abide a G-d who was hanun (one who shows grace without cause, in colloquial Israeli terms a h'nun, a freier - a sucker), willing to forgive even the evil people of Ninveh merely because they asked forgiveness despite the long and egregious record of their transgressions. Despite Jonah's moral position, it's G-d's message of His being a G-d of forgiveness that wins the day.
Therefore, I would suggest that it behooves the High Priest to enter the Holy of Holies a second time without any offering, without any act of service or dedication, even without any special prayer. The High Priest concludes his Yom Kippur service by standing before the Almighty, as it were, just as he is, representing the Jewish people as they are, albeit even devoid of merit, secure in his faith that "on this day G-d will forgive (Israel) of all their sins to purify (them)."
Tishrei 7, 5769 / 06 October 08